From c30903de74e443fffffd9d160ef6911d2d434468 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Schwarze <schwarze@openbsd.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:26:04 +0000
Subject: Using .Nd only makes sense in the NAME section. Warn if that macro
 occurs elsewhere. Triggered by a question from Dag-Erling Smoergrav <des @
 FreeBSD>.

---
 read.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'read.c')

diff --git a/read.c b/read.c
index 3e5d4116..b4718e51 100644
--- a/read.c
+++ b/read.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$Id: read.c,v 1.161 2017/02/18 17:29:28 schwarze Exp $ */
+/*	$Id: read.c,v 1.162 2017/03/06 17:26:05 schwarze Exp $ */
 /*
  * Copyright (c) 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 Kristaps Dzonsons <kristaps@bsd.lv>
  * Copyright (c) 2010-2017 Ingo Schwarze <schwarze@openbsd.org>
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ static	const char * const	mandocerrs[MANDOCERR_MAX] = {
 	"bad NAME section content",
 	"missing comma before name",
 	"missing description line, using \"\"",
+	"description line outside NAME section",
 	"sections out of conventional order",
 	"duplicate section title",
 	"unexpected section",
-- 
cgit v1.2.3