Remove the ENDBODY_NOSPACE flag, simplifying the code.

Comparing to groff output, it appears that all cases where it was used
and made a difference actually require the opposite, ENDBODY_SPACE.

I have no idea why i added it back in 2010; maybe to compensate for
some other bug that has long been fixed.

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/mdoc.c b/mdoc.c
index 7c3613f4..5be1e781 100644
--- a/mdoc.c
+++ b/mdoc.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$Id: mdoc.c,v 1.259 2017/01/28 23:30:08 schwarze Exp $ */
+/*	$Id: mdoc.c,v 1.260 2017/02/16 03:00:23 schwarze Exp $ */
 /*
  * Copyright (c) 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 Kristaps Dzonsons <kristaps@bsd.lv>
  * Copyright (c) 2010, 2012-2017 Ingo Schwarze <schwarze@openbsd.org>
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ mdoc_tail_alloc(struct roff_man *mdoc, int line, int pos, int tok)
 
 struct roff_node *
 mdoc_endbody_alloc(struct roff_man *mdoc, int line, int pos, int tok,
-		struct roff_node *body, enum mdoc_endbody end)
+		struct roff_node *body)
 {
 	struct roff_node *p;
 
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ mdoc_endbody_alloc(struct roff_man *mdoc, int line, int pos, int tok,
 	p = roff_node_alloc(mdoc, line, pos, ROFFT_BODY, tok);
 	p->body = body;
 	p->norm = body->norm;
-	p->end = end;
+	p->end = ENDBODY_SPACE;
 	roff_node_append(mdoc, p);
 	mdoc->next = ROFF_NEXT_SIBLING;
 	return p;