From e9d24264e27dc7cfcd1fc87cd2e50cc710121ed5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kristaps Dzonsons Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 21:40:45 +0000 Subject: If `Ns' is specified on its own line, it should be ignored. This is shitty groff behaviour. Do the same, but raise a warning to this effect. This from a TODO noted by schwarze@. --- TODO | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'TODO') diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index f0b8a36d..1e3524a1 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ ************************************************************************ * Official mandoc TODO. -* $Id: TODO,v 1.87 2011/01/31 12:52:43 kristaps Exp $ +* $Id: TODO,v 1.88 2011/02/02 21:40:45 kristaps Exp $ ************************************************************************ ************************************************************************ @@ -246,10 +246,6 @@ should be indented, see e.g. rpc(3); reported by jmc@ on discuss@ Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:48:33 +0100 -- .Ns should only be effective when called by another macro, - not as a stand-alone macro at the beginning of a line; - see for example the awk(1) SYNOPSIS. - - .Ns should work when called at the end of an input line, see the following code in vi(1): .It Xo -- cgit v1.2.3-56-ge451