From 4a586872ce6f32a40dd13b7fa93c56b7a3ef52d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ingo Schwarze Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 16:53:38 +0000 Subject: Rudimentary implementation of the roff(7) .char (output glyph definition) request, used for example by groff_hdtbl(7). This simplistic implementation may interact incorrectly with the .tr (input character translation) request. But come on, you are not only using .char *and* .tr, but you do so with respect to the same character in the same manual page? --- read.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'read.c') diff --git a/read.c b/read.c index fe77bee7..e9971a66 100644 --- a/read.c +++ b/read.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* $Id: read.c,v 1.199 2018/08/24 23:12:33 schwarze Exp $ */ +/* $Id: read.c,v 1.200 2018/08/25 16:53:39 schwarze Exp $ */ /* * Copyright (c) 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 Kristaps Dzonsons * Copyright (c) 2010-2018 Ingo Schwarze @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ static const char * const mandocerrs[MANDOCERR_MAX] = { "unknown library name", "invalid content in Rs block", "invalid Boolean argument", + "argument contains two font escapes", "unknown font, skipping request", "odd number of characters in request", @@ -252,6 +253,7 @@ static const char * const mandocerrs[MANDOCERR_MAX] = { "skipping display without arguments", "missing list type, using -item", "argument is not numeric, using 1", + "argument is not a character", "missing manual name, using \"\"", "uname(3) system call failed, using UNKNOWN", "unknown standard specifier", -- cgit v1.2.3-56-ge451