From 88750dda2da444fce307d20d33700d72e7c49c7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ingo Schwarze Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 01:43:52 +0000 Subject: Introduce the concept of nodes that are semantically transparent: they are skipped when looking for previous or following high-level macros. Examples include roff(7) .ft, .ll, and .ta, mdoc(7) .Sm and .Tg, and man(7) .DT and .PD. Use this concept for a variety of improved decisions in various validators and formatters. While here, * remove a few const qualifiers on struct arguments that caused trouble; * get rid of some more Yoda notation in the vicinity; * and apply some other stylistic improvements in the vicinity. I found this class of issues while considering .Tg patches from kn@. --- regress/mdoc/Fl/spacing.in | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) create mode 100644 regress/mdoc/Fl/spacing.in (limited to 'regress/mdoc/Fl/spacing.in') diff --git a/regress/mdoc/Fl/spacing.in b/regress/mdoc/Fl/spacing.in new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6b59478f --- /dev/null +++ b/regress/mdoc/Fl/spacing.in @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +.\" $OpenBSD: spacing.in,v 1.1 2020/02/27 01:25:58 schwarze Exp $ +.Dd $Mdocdate: February 27 2020 $ +.Dt FL-SPACING 1 +.Os +.Sh NAME +.Nm Fl-spacing +.Nd horizontal spacing after flag macros +.Sh DESCRIPTION +with argument: +.Fl a +.Pp +no next node: +.Xo Fl Xc suffix +.Pp +transparent next node only: +.Xo Fl +.Tg transparent1 +.Xc suffix +.Pp +following text: +.Fl +text +.Pp +text after transparent node on the same line: +.Fl Es < > +text +.Pp +following macro on the same line: +.Fl Em word +.Pp +following macro on the next line: +.Fl +.Em word +.Pp +following macro on the next line after transparent node on the same line: +.Fl Es < > +.Em word +.Pp +following macro after transparent node on the next line: +.Fl +.Tg transparent3 +.Em word -- cgit v1.2.3-56-ge451