From 4a586872ce6f32a40dd13b7fa93c56b7a3ef52d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Schwarze <schwarze@openbsd.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 16:53:38 +0000
Subject: Rudimentary implementation of the roff(7) .char (output glyph
 definition) request, used for example by groff_hdtbl(7).

This simplistic implementation may interact incorrectly
with the .tr (input character translation) request.
But come on, you are not only using .char *and* .tr, but you do so
with respect to the same character in the same manual page?
---
 regress/roff/char/basic.in | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 regress/roff/char/basic.in

(limited to 'regress/roff/char/basic.in')

diff --git a/regress/roff/char/basic.in b/regress/roff/char/basic.in
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cfa1880a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/regress/roff/char/basic.in
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+.\" $OpenBSD: basic.in,v 1.1 2018/08/25 16:43:52 schwarze Exp $
+.TH CHAR-BASIC 1 "August 25, 2018"
+.SH NAME
+char-basic \(en the char request
+.SH DESCRIPTION
+initial text
+.char \[myc] myval
+.char x y
+.char \[boldX] \fBX
+\[boldX] \[myc]
+final text
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-56-ge451